Social proactiveness and innovation: The impact of stakeholder salience on corporate entrepreneurship

Authors

Abstract

Innovation has become a major strategic component of corporate entrepreneurship. Managerial decisions regarding innovative activity are complex and can be affected by numerous factors. In this study, we draw upon the tenets of stakeholder theory to examine how stakeholder salience (consisting of stockholders, employees, and customers) is integral to the decisions made by senior level managers related to social proactiveness within a corporate innovation strategy. In doing so, we introduce a social proactiveness scale that examines a manager’s priorities toward internal and external social issues. Examining 200 senior-level managers, we find that companies which place salience on employees are more proactive on both internal and external social issues, while those placing salience on stockholders are more proactive on internal social issues but not external social issues. Surprisingly, placing salience on customers is associated with neither internal nor external social issues. Finally, the data suggests that proactiveness related to internal social issues leads to greater internal innovation with external innovation mediating the relationship, whereas proactiveness on external social issues is not related to innovation.

References

Agarwal, P.K., Kumar, P., Swati, G., & Tyagi, A.K. 2010. Cause related marketing in India:

A conceptual paradigm. Advances in Management, 3(12), 24-31.

Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K., & Sonnenfeld, J.A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An

investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (5), 507 – 525.

Backhaus, K.B., Stone, B.A., & Heiner, K. 2002. Exploring the relationship between

Corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society,

(3), 292-320.

Baden-Fuller, C. 1995. Strategic innovation, corporate entrepreneurship and matching outside-in

to inside-out approaches to strategy research. British Journal of Management, 6 (Special

Issue): S3-S16.

Bateman, T.S. & Grant, J.M. 1993. The proactive component of organizational behavior:

A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(March), 103 –

Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics

of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 207-229.

Borch, O.J., Huse, M., & Senneseth, K. 1999. Resource configuration, competitive

strategies, and corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical examination of small firms.

Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 24 (1): 49-70.

Buss, D. M. 1987. Selection, evocation and manipulation. Journal of Personality and

Social Psychology, 53(4), 1214-1221.

Carroll, A.B. 1979. A three-dimensional model of corporate performance. Academy

of Management Review, 4, 497-505.

Clarkson, M.B.E. 1991. Defining, evaluating, and managing corporate social

performance: The stakeholder management model. In L.E. Preston (Ed.), Research in corporate social performance and policy, 12, 331 – 358. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Clarkson, M.B.E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate

Social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92 – 117.

Clarkson, M.B.E. 1988. The corporation and its stakeholders: Classic and

contemporary readings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Covin, J.G. & Slevin, D.P. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and

benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 1(10), 75-87.

Covin, J.G. & Miles, M.P. 1999. Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of

competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23 (3): 47-64.

Covin, J.G., Slevin, D.P., & Heeley, M.B. 2000. Pioneers and followers: Competitive

tactics, environment, and firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 15: 175-210.

Dunham, L., Freeman, R.E., & Liedtka, J. 2006. Enhancing stakeholder practice: A

particularized exploration of community. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(1), 23-42.

Floyd, S.W. & Lane, P.J. 2000. Strategizing throughout the organization: Managing role

conflict in strategic renewal. Academy of Management Review, 25, 154-177.

Freeman, R.E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Friedman, B.A. 2009. Human resource management role implications for corporate reputation.

Corporate Reputation Review, 12(3), 229-244.

Guth, W.D. & Ginsberg A. 1990. Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management

Journal, 11 (Special Issue): 5-15.

Hamilton, J.T. 1995. Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics

release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,

, 98-113.

Hatch, M.J. & Schultz, M. 1997. Relations between organizational culture, identity and image.

European Journal of Marketing, 31(5/6), 356-365.

Hayton, J. C. 2005. Promoting corporate entrepreneurship through human resource

management practices: A review of empirical research. Human Resource

Management Review, 15, 21-41.

Hemingway, C. 2005. Personal values as a catalyst for corporate social entrepreneurship.

Journal of Business Ethics, 60 (3), 233-249.

Herrbach, O. & Mignonac, K. 2004. How organisational image affects employee attitudes.

Human Resource Management Journal, 14(4), 76-88.

Hornsby, Jeffrey S., Kuratko, Donald F., Shepherd, Dean A., & Bott, Jennifer P. 2009.

Managers ‘corporate entrepreneurial actions: Examining perception and position,

Journal of Business Venturing, 24 (3), 236-247.

Hornsby, J.S., Kuratko, D.F., & Zahra, S.A. 2002. Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: Assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 49-63.

Ireland, R. D., Covin, J.G., & Kuratko, D.F. 2009. Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33 (1), 19-46.

Ireland, R.D., Kuratko, D.F., & Morris, M. 2006. A health audit for corporate

entrepreneurship: Innovation at all levels (Part 1). Journal of Business Strategy, 27 (2), 10 – 17.

Jauch, L.R. & Glueck, W.F. 1980. Short term financial success in large business

business organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 1(1), 49-63.

Jones, T.M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics.

Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.

Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. 1993. USREL-8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific

Software.

Klassen, R.D., & McLaughlin, C.P. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm

performance. Management Science, 42, 1199-1214.

Konar, S. & Cohen, M.A. 1997. Information as regulation: The effect of community right to

know laws on toxic emissions. Journal of Environmental Ethics and Management,

, 109-124.

Kuratko, D.F. & Audretsch, D.B. 2013. Clarifying the domains of corporate entrepreneurship.

International Entrepreneurship & Management Journal, 9 (3), 323-335.

Kuratko, D.F., Covin, J.G., & Garrett, R.P. 2009. Corporate venturing: Insights from actual

performance, Business Horizons, 52 (5): 459-467.

Kuratko, D.F., Hornsby, J.S., & Covin, J.G., 2014. Diagnosing a firm’s internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57 (1), 27-47.

Kuratko, D.F., Hornsby, J.S., & Goldsby, M.G., 2007. The relationship of stakeholder

salience, organizational posture, and entrepreneurial intensity to corporate

entrepreneurship. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13 (4), 56-72.

Kuratko, D.F., Ireland, R. D., Covin, J.G., & Hornsby, J.S., 2005. A model of middle-level managers’ entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29 (6), 699-716.

McGrath, R.G., Venkataraman, S. & MacMillan, I.C. 1994. The advantage chain:

Antecedents to rents from internal corporate ventures. Journal of Business Venturing,

: 351-369.

Miller, D. 1987. Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance.

Academy of Management Journal, 30(1), 7-32.

Mitchell, R.K. & Agle, B.R. 1997. Stakeholder identification and salience: Dialogue and

Operationalization. In J. Weber & K. Rehbein (Eds.). International Association for

Business and Society 1997 Proceedings: 365-370, FL: International Association for

Business and Society.

Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G., 2011. Corporate entrepreneurship & innovation. 3rd ed, Cincinnati, OH: Cengage/South-Western.

Muoghalu, M.I., Robison, H.D., & Glascock, J.L. 1990. Hazardous waste lawsuits, stockholder

returns and deterence. Southern Economic Journal, 57, 357-370.

Narayanan, V. K., Yang, Y., & Zahra, S. A. 2009. Corporate venturing and value

creation: A review and proposed framework. Research Policy, 38 (1): 58-76.

Ozmoyer, A., Calantone, R.J., & DiBonetto, A. 1997. What makes firms more innovative? A

look at organizational and environmental factors. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 12(6), 400-418.

Sandberg, B. 2002. Creating the market for disruptive innovation: Market proactiveness

At the launch stage. Journal of Targeting, Measurement, and Analysis for Marketing, 11(2), 184-196.

Schlange, L.E. 2009. Stakeholder identification in sustainable entrepreneurship. Greener Management International, 55, 13-32.

Shepherd, D.A. & Patzelt, H. 2011. The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 35(1), 137-163.

Venkatraman, N. 1989. Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct,

dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35 (August), 942-962.

Vozikis, G.S., Bruton, G.D., Prasad, D., & Merikas, A.A. 1999. Linking corporate

entrepreneurship to financial theory through additional value creation. Entrepreneurship

Theory & Practice, 24 (2): 33-43.

Wartick, S.L. & Cochran, P.L. 1985. The evolution of the corporate social performance

Model. Academy of Management Review, 4, 758-769.

Waddock, S.A. & Graves, S.B. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial

performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 303-319.

Wright, P., Ferris, S.P., Hiller, J.S., & Kroll, M. 1995. Competitiveness through management

of diversity: Effects on stock price valuation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1),

-287.

Zahra, S.A. 1993. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance:

A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 319-340.

Zahra, S.A., Kuratko, D.F., & Jennings, D.F. 1999. Entrepreneurship and the acquisition of

dynamic organizational capabilities. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 23 (3): 5-10.

Zahra, S.A., Filatotchev, I., & Wright, M. 2009. How do threshold firms sustain corporate

entrepreneurship? The role of boards and absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 24 (3), 248-260.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-18

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 2 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

The Journal of Small Business Strategy (the “Publisher”) and the Author(s) agree as follows:
 
1.Author(s) hereby grant to Publisher all right, title, and interest in and to the Work, including copyright to all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. If Publisher does not publish the Work within two (2) years of the Effective Date, copyright shall revert back to the Author. Publisher agrees to always credit Author(s) as the author(s) of the Work.
 
2.Publisher hereby grants Author a royalty-free, limited license for the following purposes, provided the Work is always identified as having first been published by Publisher.
    •The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of the Work for use in teaching;
    •The right to use all or part of the material contained in the Work in a book by the Author(s), or in a collection of the Author(s)’s work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author(s)’s place of employment, and for promotion and any other non-commercial purposes;
    •The right to use figures and tables from the Work for any purpose;
    •The right to make presentations of material from the Work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author(s)’s Web site and on the Author(s)’s university’s institute repository;
Such license shall be effective when the Work is first published in the Journal of Small Business Strategy.
 
3.The Author(s) represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author(s)’s original work and that Author(s) has full power to enter into this agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property right of another; (c) contains no materials which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or violates another’s civil right, right of privacy, or is otherwise unlawful; and (d) has not been previously published, in whole or in part. Author(s) shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss or expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.

Most read articles by the same author(s)