A Revised Conceptual Model of the Firm-Level Entrepreneurial Process

Authors

  • Patrick M. Kreiser Ohio University
  • Justin Davis Ohio University

Abstract

Research suggests that existing conceptualizations of firm-level entrepreneurship may not be sufficient in fully explaining the construct (Brown, Davidsson, & Wiklund, 2001; Brush, Manolova, & Edelman, 2008). In particular, there is little consensus regarding the organizational attributes that underlie the entrepreneurial act. This study integrates and extends existing conceptualizations to form a new theoretical framework for studying the firm-level entrepreneurial process. It is argued that three attributes: innovativeness, proactiveness, and strategic renewal, are necessary preconditions for firms to be considered truly "entrepreneurial." The role that these three firm-level attributes play in generating important entrepreneurial outcomes is also considered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvarez SA. (2007). Entrepreneurial rents and the theory of the firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3):427-442.

Alvarez, S.A., & Barney, J.B. (2005). How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty? Journal of Management, 31(5): 776-793.

Alvarez, S.A., & Busenitz, L.W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resourcebased theory. Journal of Management, 27: 755-775.

Anderson, P.J., Blatt, R., Christianson, M.K., Grant, A.M., Marquis, C., Neuman, E.J., Sonenshein, S., & Sutcliffe, K.M. (2006). Understanding Mechanisms in organizational research: Reflections from a collective journey. Journal of Management Inquiry, 15 (2): 102-113.

Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.

Brown, T.E., Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). An operationalization of Stevenson's conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunitybased firm behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 953-968.

Brush, C.G., Manolova, T.S., & Edelman, L.F. (2008). Properties of emerging organizations: An empirical test. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(5): 547-566.

Burgelman, R.A. (1983). Corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management: Insights from a process study. Management Science, 29(12): 1349-1364.

Covin, J.G., Green, K.M., & Slevin, D.P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation-sales growth rate relationships. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1): 57-81.

Covin, J.G., & Miles, M.P. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3): 47-63.

Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1988). The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3): 217-259.

Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 75-87.

Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1): 7-25.

Davidsson, P., Low, M.B., & Wright, M. (2001). Editor's introduction: Low and MacMillan ten years on: Achievements and future directions for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4): 5-15.

Dess, G.G., Ireland, R.D., Zahra, S.A., Floyd, S.W., Janney, J.J., & Lane, P.J. (2003). Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3): 351-378.

Green, K.M., Covin, J.G., & Slevin, D.P. (2008). Exploring the relationship between strategic reactiveness and entrepreneurial orientation: The role of structure-style fit. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(3): 356-383.

Guth, W.D., & Ginsberg, A. (1990). Guest editors' introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 5-15.

Hatch, N.W., & Dyer, J.H. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 1155-1179.

Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A., & Sirmon, D.G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6): 963-989.

Ireland, R.D., Kuratko, D.F., & Covin, J.G. (2003). Antecedents, elements, and consequences of corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings.

Keh, H.T., Nguyen, T.T.M., & Ng, H.P. (2007). The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing information on the performance of SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4): 592-611.

Knight, F.H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. New York, NY: Kelly and Millman, Inc.

Kuratko, D.F., Hornsby, J.S., & Goldsby, M.G. (2004). Sustaining corporate entrepreneurship: Modeling perceived implementation and outcome comparisons at organizational and individual levels. International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation, 5(2): 77-90.

Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1): 135-172.

Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16: 429-451.

Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7): 770-791.

Palich, L., & Bagby, R.. (1995). Using cognitive theory to explain entrepreneurial risk-taking: Challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6): 425-438.

Schollhammer, H. (1982). Internal corporate entrepreneurship. In C. Kent, D. Sexton, and K. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship, 209-223. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1): 217-226.

Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J.J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(2): 11-27.

Shih, C., & Chang, Y. (2008). Creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship in R&D management. R&D Management, 38(3): 253-264.

Stevenson, H., & Jarillo, J. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 17-27.

Stopford, J.M., & Baden-Fuller, C.W.F. (1990). Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7): 521-537.

Tan J. (2001). Innovation and risk-taking in a transitional economy: A comparative study of Chinese managers and entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4): 359-377.

Tan J. (2007). Phase transitions and emergence of entrepreneurship: The transformation of Chinese SOEs over time. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1): 77-96.

Verbeke, A, Chrisman, J, & Yuan, W. (2007). A note on strategic renewal and corporate venturing in the subsidiaries of multinational enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(4): 585-600.

Wang, C.L. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4): 635-657.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-181.

Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1): 71-91.

Woolley, J.L., & Rottner, R.M. (2008). Innovation policy and nanotechnology entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5): 791-811.

Zahra, S.A. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 319-340.

Zahra, S.A., & Covin, J.G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10: 43-58.

Zahra, S.A., & Garvis D.M. (2000). International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: The moderating effect of international environmental hostility. Journal of Business Venturing, 15: 469-93.

Zahra, S.A., Jennings, D.F., & Kuratko, D.F. (1999). The antecedents and consequences of firm-level entrepreneurship: The state of the field. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(2): 45-65.

Zahra, S.A., Nielsen, A.P., & Bogner, W.C. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge, and competence development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3): 169-189.

Downloads

Published

2009-01-21

How to Cite

Kreiser, P. M., & Davis, J. (2009). A Revised Conceptual Model of the Firm-Level Entrepreneurial Process. Journal of Small Business Strategy (archive Only), 20(1), 1–18. Retrieved from https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/113

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 1 (2009)

Section

Articles

License

The Journal of Small Business Strategy (the “Publisher”) and the Author(s) agree as follows:
 
1.Author(s) hereby grant to Publisher all right, title, and interest in and to the Work, including copyright to all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. If Publisher does not publish the Work within two (2) years of the Effective Date, copyright shall revert back to the Author. Publisher agrees to always credit Author(s) as the author(s) of the Work.
 
2.Publisher hereby grants Author a royalty-free, limited license for the following purposes, provided the Work is always identified as having first been published by Publisher.
    •The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of the Work for use in teaching;
    •The right to use all or part of the material contained in the Work in a book by the Author(s), or in a collection of the Author(s)’s work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author(s)’s place of employment, and for promotion and any other non-commercial purposes;
    •The right to use figures and tables from the Work for any purpose;
    •The right to make presentations of material from the Work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author(s)’s Web site and on the Author(s)’s university’s institute repository;
Such license shall be effective when the Work is first published in the Journal of Small Business Strategy.
 
3.The Author(s) represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author(s)’s original work and that Author(s) has full power to enter into this agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property right of another; (c) contains no materials which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or violates another’s civil right, right of privacy, or is otherwise unlawful; and (d) has not been previously published, in whole or in part. Author(s) shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss or expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.

Most read articles by the same author(s)