Empirical Implications for Small Business Drug Policies

Authors

  • Donald R. Curtis Stephen F. Austin State University
  • Dillard B. Tinsley Stephen F. Austin State University
  • Geralyn McClure Franklin Stephen F. Austin State University

Abstract

The results of empirical studies of small and large businesses parallel each other regarding the characteristics of drug policies. Drug policies affect organizational performance, including improved productivity and reduced accidents. EAPs are an effective approach to drug policies. and outside contractors are common sources of information and services. Pre-employment testing is usually combined with other types of testing , but careful attention is needed to meet legal requirements. Employees with positive tests may cause difficulties, but, overall. employee morale rises. Small businesses without drug policies are increasing  their competitive risks.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aalbens, R . J., & R ubin, H. W. (1991). Coun's rul ings on testing crack down on drug abuse. Risk Management, 38( 3), 36-41.

Axel, H. (1990). Corporate experiences with drug resting programs. Research Repon # 941 . New York: The Conference Boasd.

Beilinson, J. (1991 ). Are EAPs the answer? Personnel, 68(1 ), 3-4.

Blum, T. C. ( 1990). The presence and integration of drug abuse intervention in human resource management. Business Insights, 6(2), 8-17, 35.

Gallup Organization. (1990). Willingness to take a pre-employment drug test. Saddle Brook , New Jersey: Accountants on Call.

Gleason, P. M., Veum, J. R., & Pergamit, M. R. (1991). Drug and alcohol use at work: A survey of young workers. M onthly Labor Review , 114( 8), 3-7.

Halevy, A. K . (1992). Drug and alcohol policies: ADA concerns. Texas Bar Journal. 55(9), 836-839.

Harris, M. M., & Heft, L. L. (1992). Alcohol and drug use in the workplace: Issues, contro­ versies, and directions for future reseasch. Journal of M anagement, 18( 2), 239-266.

Humphreys, R . M. (1990). Substance abuse: The employer's perspective. Employment Relations Today, 17(1), 45-82.

Huneycutt, A. W., & Wibker, E. A. (1989). Managerial responses to drug abuse in the workplace. Journal of Small Business M anagement, 27(2), 63-67.

Liem, S. A. (1992). The Founh Amendment and drug testing in the work place: Current U.S. coun decisions. Labor Law Journal, 43 (I ), 50-57.

Nobile, R . J. (1990). The drug-free workplace: Act on it ' Personnel. 67(2), 21-23.

Pasliman , G. C., & Edwasds, E. L. ( 1992). Employee assistance programs: An employer's guide to emerging liability issues. Employee Relations Law Journal 17(4), 593-602.

Segal , J. A. (1992). To test or not to test. HRMagazine, 37(4), 40-43.

Published

1993-01-09

Issue

Section

Articles