Indifference Curve Analysis: Beyond Simplifying Assumptions
This article presents the proper analysis of indifference curve systems once some of the simplifying assumptions used to teach beginning students are relaxed. First, the diminishing MRS assumption is relaxed to allow the existence of concave4 indifference curves. Then the more-is-better assumption is relaxed. This reveals a potential source of confusion for students: usually one can find the optimum of a system by choosing the point where the budget line touches the most northeastern indifference curve, but once the more-is-better assumption is relaxed, the preference order of the indifference curves becomes the main criterion – not geographical location. Once both assumptions are removed, we study the case where too much of a good thing can become a bad thing – that is, where the consumer can encounter satiation.
By making research freely available, we help support the greater global exchange of knowledge. There are no article submission or processing charges. Each journal volume is preserved via the Walker Library's three level preservation methods including local and cloud storage. The author(s) retains/retain the copyright to the work, but grants the Journal the right to publish, display, and distribute the work in print and electronic format. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. For more information on this license go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.