Stakeholder Theory and the Entrepreneurial Firm

  • Ronald K. Mitchell Texas Tech University
  • Boyd Cohen University of Victoria


This paper offers a typology of a stakeholder theory of the entrepreneurial firm, such that a new lens for entrepreneurial management emerges. We (1) generated a list of purported "theories of the firm" from the literature; (2) applied qualifying criteria; (3) analyzed the list according to two dimensions-stakeholder inclusion and stakeholder equilibration strength-to categorize these theories of the firm into a typology revealing gaps in the theory-of-the-firm literature; and (4) identified research questions for a stakeholder theory of the entrepreneurial firm that raises entrepreneurial management issues.


Download data is not yet available.


AgIe, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal Special Research Forum on Stakeholder Theory, 42(5), 507-525.

Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E. (1993). Challenges to theory development in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management Studies, 30(5), 815-834.

Barney, J. ( 1991 ). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17( 1 ), 99-120.

Barr, J. & Saraceno, F. (2002). A computational theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 49(3), 345-361.

Bartlett, C. & Ghoshal, S. (1993). Beyond the M-form: Toward a managerial theory of the firm.. Strategic Management Journal. 14,23-46.

Boulding, K. (1950). A reconstruction of economics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Brenner, S. & Cochran, P. L. (1991). The stakeholder model of the firm: Implications for business and society theory and research. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society, 449-467.

Bucar, B. & Hisrich, R. (2001). Ethics of business managers vs. entrepreneurs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneur ship, 6(1), 59-82.

Canterbery, (1994), Boulding's T, Kaleckian power, and Minsky's fragility hypothesis. Journal of Economic Issues, 28(4), 1227-1248.

Casson, M. (1996). The nature of the firm reconsidered: Information synthesis and entrepreneurial organization. Management International Review, 36(1), 55-94.

Caves, R. E. (1980). Industrial organization, corporate strategy and structure. Journal of Economic Literature, 18(March), 64-92.

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder f ramework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117.

Coase, R., H. (1937). The nature of the firm, Economica New Series 4. In G. J. Stigler & K. E. Boulding (Eds.), Readings in Price Theory, pp. 386-405. Homewood, IL: Irwin.

Cyert, R. M. & March, J. G. (1963). The Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.

Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. (2004). Dispersed knowledge and an entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 659-679.

DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48( April), 147-160.

Drucker, P. F. (1973). Management. New York: Harper & Row.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

Furubotn, E. (2001). The new institutional economics and the theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(2), 133.

Grandstrand, O. ( 1998). Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Research Policy, 27,465-489.

Grossman, S. & Hart, O. (1986). The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. The Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 691-719.

Hannan, M. T. & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

Hodgson, G.M. (1998). Evolutionary and competence-based theories of the firm. Journal of Economic Studies, 25(1), 25-56.

Jensen, M. & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.

Kogut, B & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 3, 383-397.

Kogut, B. & Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502-518.

Mitchell, R. K. (2001). Transaction cognition theory and high performance economic results Victoria, BC: International Centre for Venture Expertise.

Mitchell, R. K. (2002a). Entrepreneurship and stakeholder theory: Comment on Ruffin Lecture #2. Business Ethics Quarterly: The Ruffin Series, 3, 175- 196.

Mitchell, R. K. (2002b). Stakeholders of the world unite: Assessing progress on the path toward a stakeholder theory of the firm. In D. Windsor & S. A. Welcomer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference, June 27-30, 2002, Victoria, BC, Canada: International Association for Business and Society, pp. 223-225.

Mitchell, R. K., AgIe, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academv of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.

Muller, H. & Wareryd, K. (2001). Inside versus outside ownership: A political theory of the firm,. The Rand Journal of Economics, 32(3), 527-541.

Nelson, R. R. & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Chapter V: inherited resources and the direction of expansion, pp. 65-87. New York: Wiley.

Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.

Porter, M. E. (1984). Strategic interaction: Some lessons from industry histories for theory and antitrust policy. In R. Lamb ( Ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, pp. 415-443. Don Mills, ON, Canada: Pearson Education Canada.

Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243-264.

Schumpeter, J. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

Slater, S. (1997). Developing a customervalue based theory of the firm. Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2), 162-167.

Smith, A. (1774/1937). The wealth of nations. New York: Modern Library.

Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Organizations and social structure. In J. G. March ( Ed.), Handbook of Organisations, pp. 142-193. Chicago: RandMcNaIIy.

Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In J. Katz (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth, 3, 119-138. JAI Press.

Venkataraman, S. (2002). Stakeholder value equilibration and the entrepreneurial process. Business Ethics Quarterly: The Ruffin Series, 3,45-58.

Vesper, K. H. (1996). New Venture Experience. Seattle, WA: Vector Books.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,5, 171-180.

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

Williamson, O. E. (1991). Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization. Strategic

Management Journal, 12(S), 75-94.
How to Cite
MITCHELL, Ronald K.; COHEN, Boyd. Stakeholder Theory and the Entrepreneurial Firm. Journal of Small Business Strategy, [S.l.], v. 17, n. 1, p. 1-16, jan. 2006. ISSN 2380-1751. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 18 apr. 2019.