The Influence of Strategic Focus & Gender on Performance: An Examination of Small Businesses

Authors

  • Shanan G. Gibson East Carolina University

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which strategic focus (internal versus external) and the gender of small business owners are predictive of perceived organizational performance. Utilizing a sample of 237 small business owners in the southeastern region of the U.S., a factorial ANOVA was used to test hypotheses related to both constructs. Results indicate that a main effect exists for organizational strategic focus, but not for gender. While female business owners who utilize an internal strategy had the highest levels of perceived performance, the interaction effect was not statistically significant.

References

Boden, R. & Nucci, A. (2000). On the survival prospects of men's and women's new business ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(4), 347-362.

Boohene, R., Sheridan, A. & Kotey, B. (2008). Gender, personal values, strategies and small business performance: A Ghanaian case study. Equal Opportunities International, 27(3), 237-257.

Brush, C. G., & Chaganti, R. (1999). Businesses without glamour? An analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 14(3), 233-257.

Carter, S. & Rosa, P. (1998). The financing of male- and female-owned businesses. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 10, 225-241.

Carter, N. M., Williams, M., & Reynolds, P. D. (1997). Discontinuance among new firms in retail: The influence of initial resources, strategy, and gender. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(2), 125-145.

Chaganti, R., & Parasuraman, S. (1996). A study of the impacts of gender on business performance and management patterns in small businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 21(2), 73-75.

Coleman, S. (2002). Constraints faced by women small business owners: Evidence from the data. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 151-174.

Daniel, T.A. (2004). The exodus of women from the corporate workplace to self owned businesses. Employment Relations Today, 30(4), 55-61.

Davis, M.A., Miles, G., & McDowell, W.C. (2008). Environmental scanning as a moderator of strategy-performance relationships: an empirical analysis of physical therapy facilities. Health Services Management Research, 21: 81-92.

Dess, G.C., & Robinson, R.B. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: the case of privately-held firms and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5: 265-273.

Edelman, L.F., Brush, C.G. & Manolova, T. (2005). Co-alignment in the resource-performance relationship: Strategy as a mediator. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 359-383.

Heilman, M.E. & Chen, J.J. (2003). Entrepreneurship as a solution: The allure of self-employment for women and minorities. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 347-364.

Jones, K. (2000). Psychodynamics, gender, and reactionary entrepreneurship in metropolitan Sao Paulo Brazil. Women in Management Review, 15(4), 207-217.

Jones, K. & Tullous, R. (2002). Behaviors of pre-venture entrepreneurs and perceptions of their financial needs. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), 233-249.

Knotts, T.L., Jones, S.C. & Brown, K.L. (2008). The effect of strategic orientation and gender on survival: A study of potential mass merchandising suppliers. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 99-113.

Krueger, N., Reilly, M. & Carsrud, A. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5/6), 411-432.

Kumar, K., Subramanian, R., & Strandholm, K. (2001). Competitive strategy, environmental scanning and performance. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 11: 1-33.

Marlow, S. & Carter, S. (2004). Accounting for change: professional status, gender disadvantage and self-employment. Women in Management Review, 19(1), 5-17.

Marlow, S. & Patton, D. (2005). All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 717-735.

Mazzarol, T., Reboud, S. & Soutar, G.N. (2009). Strategic planning in growth oriented small firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 15(4), 320-345.

Miles, R.E., & Snow, C.C. (1978). Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.

Miller, D. (1981). Toward a new contingency theory: The search for organizational gestalts. Journal of Management Studies, 18, 1-26.

Minniti, Allen, & Langowitz, (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2005 report on women and entrepreneurship. Babson Park, MA: The Center for Women's Leadership at Babson College.

Minniti, M. Bygrave, W.D. & Autio, E. (2006). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2005 executive report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.

Moreno, A.M. & Casillas, J.C. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMEs: A causal model. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 32(3), 507-528.

Morrison, R. (2000). Entrepreneurship: What triggers it? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 6(2), 59-71.

Perry, S. C. (2002). A comparison of failed and non-failed small businesses in the United States: Do men and women use different planning and decision making strategies. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(4), 415-428.

Poutziouris, P. (2003). The strategic orientation of owner-managers of small ventures: Evidence from the UK small business economy. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 9(5), 185-214.

Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy. New York: Free Press.

Robb, A. M. (2002). Entrepreneurial performance by women and minorities: The case for new firms. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(4), 383-397.

Rogers, P.R., Miller, A., & Judge, W.Q. (1999). Using information processing theory to understand planning/performance relationships in the context of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 567-577.

Runyan, R.C., Huddleston, P. & Swinney, J. (2006). Entrepreneurship orientation and social capital as small firm strategies: A study of gender differences from a resource-based view. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2(4), 455-477.

Sandberg, K.W. (2003). An exploratory study of women in micro enterprises: Gender-related differences. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 10(4), 408-417.

Shaw, E., Carter, S., & Brierton, J. (2001). Unequal entrepreneurs: Why female enterprise is an uphill business. London: The Industrial Society.

Sonfield, M., Lussier, R., Corman, J. & McKinney, M. (2001). Gender comparisons in strategic decision-making: An empirical analysis of the entrepreneurial strategy matrix. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(2), 165-173.

Subramanian, Ram; Kumar, Kamalesh; Strandholm, Karen. (2009). The relationship between market orientation and performance under different environmental conditions: the moderating effect of the top management team's risk taking behavior. Academy of Strategic Management Journal.

Thompson, J. L. (2004). Innovation through people. Management Decision, 42(9), 1082-1094.

Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 464-476.

Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison approach. Academy of Management Review, 11: 801-814.

Verheul, I., Risseeuw, P. & Bartelse, G. (2002). Gender differences in strategy and human resource management: The case of Dutch real estate brokerage. International Small Business Journal, 20(4), 969-988.

Verheul, I. & Thurik, R. (2001). Start-up capital: Does gender matter? Small Business Economics, 16(4), 329-345.

Weiler, S. & Bernasek, A. (2001). Dodging the glass ceiling? Networks and the new wave of women entrepreneurs. Social Science Journal, 38, 85-103.

Downloads

Published

2010-05-21

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 2 (2010)

Section

Articles

License

The Journal of Small Business Strategy (the “Publisher”) and the Author(s) agree as follows:
 
1.Author(s) hereby grant to Publisher all right, title, and interest in and to the Work, including copyright to all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. If Publisher does not publish the Work within two (2) years of the Effective Date, copyright shall revert back to the Author. Publisher agrees to always credit Author(s) as the author(s) of the Work.
 
2.Publisher hereby grants Author a royalty-free, limited license for the following purposes, provided the Work is always identified as having first been published by Publisher.
    •The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of the Work for use in teaching;
    •The right to use all or part of the material contained in the Work in a book by the Author(s), or in a collection of the Author(s)’s work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author(s)’s place of employment, and for promotion and any other non-commercial purposes;
    •The right to use figures and tables from the Work for any purpose;
    •The right to make presentations of material from the Work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author(s)’s Web site and on the Author(s)’s university’s institute repository;
Such license shall be effective when the Work is first published in the Journal of Small Business Strategy.
 
3.The Author(s) represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author(s)’s original work and that Author(s) has full power to enter into this agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property right of another; (c) contains no materials which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or violates another’s civil right, right of privacy, or is otherwise unlawful; and (d) has not been previously published, in whole or in part. Author(s) shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss or expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.

How to Cite

The Influence of Strategic Focus & Gender on Performance: An Examination of Small Businesses. (2010). Journal of Small Business Strategy (archive Only), 21(2), 47-58. https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/147