Performance of Historically Underrepresented Firms in the Public-Private Sector

Authors

  • Troy A. Voelker University of Houston Clear Lake
  • William C. McDowell East Carolina University

Abstract

This study examines the performance of historically underrepresented firms, which includes women-owned businesses and socially disadvantaged businesses. We examine performance in the context of securing public contracts and compare the performance of these historically underrepresented firms to those of non-minority small and large businesses. Utilizing a sample of all contracts awarded by the Johnson Space Center, a NASA directorate located in Houston, Texas, which identified 5,676 contracts totaling approximately $157 billion, we found that small businesses received around 63% of all contracts. The results indicate that more diverse firms received higher awards than specialists and that disadvantaged firms received higher dollar awards than general small businesses. In addition, women-owned businesses neither outperformed nor performed more poorly than general small business in the dollar amounts of contracts received, and they are neither more or less specialized than general small and large businesses. A discussion, practical implications, and future research ideas are also presented.

References

Abramowicz, K., & Sparks, H. C. (2007). The Small Business Administration's 8(a) business development program. CPA Journal, 77(2), 60-62.

Audretsch, D. B. (2003). Standing on the shoulders of midgets: The U.S. Small Business Innovation Research program (SBIR). Small Business Economics, 20(2), 129-136.

Beekman, A. V., & Robinson, R. B. (2004). Supplier partnerships and the small, high-growth firm: Selecting for success. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(1), 59-77.

Blanchflower, D. G. (2009). Minority self-employment in the United States and the impact of affirmative action programs. Annals of Finance, 5(3/4), 361-396.

Bovaird, T. (2004). Public-private partnerships: from contested concepts to prevalent practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70, 199-215.

Carter, N. M., & Williams, M. (1997). Discontinuance among new firms in retail: The influence of initial resources, strategy, and gender. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(2), 125.

Carter, S., & Rosa, P. (1998). The financing of male- and female-owned businesses. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 10(3), 225-241.

Cavalluzzo, K. S., Cavalluzzo, L. C., & Wolken, J. D. (2002). Competition, small business financing, and discrimination: Evidence from a new survey. Journal of Business, 75(4), 641.

Chaganti, R., & Parasuraman, S. (1996). A study of impacts of gender on business performance and management patterns in small business. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 21(2), 73-75.

Connell, D. (2009). Innovation and procurement policy: Using government procurement to help grow new science and technology companies: Lessons from the US small business innovation research (SBIR) programme. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 11(1), 127.

Cooper, R. S. (2003). Purpose and performance of the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 137.

Daniel, T. A. (2004). The exodus of women from the corporate workplace to self-owned businesses. Employment Relations Today (Wiley), 30(4), 55.

Das, T. K., & He, I. Y. (2006). Entrepreneurial firms in search of established partners: Review and recommendations. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 12(3), 114-143.

Gelinas, R., & Bigras, Y. (2004). The characteristics and features of SMEs: Favorable or unfavorable to logistics integration? Journal of Small Business Management, 42(3), 263-278.

Held, B. (2007). Improving the Department of Defense's Small Business Innovation Research program. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Institute.

Held, B., Edison, T., Pfleeger, S. L., Anton, P. S., & Clancy, J. (2006). Evaluation and recommendations for improvement of the Department of Defense Small Business Innovative Research Program. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Institute.

Kelly, S. (2007). The Function and character of relationship benefits: Transferring capabilities and resources to the small firm. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(4), 602-619.

Lee, L., & Gongming, Q. (2007). Partnership or self-reliance: Prescriptions for small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Strategy, 28(6), 29-33.

Lerner, J. (1999). The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Business, 72(3), 285.

Myers Jr, S. L., & Ha, I. (2009). Estimation of race-neutral goals in public procurement and contracting. Applied Economics Letters, 16(3), 251.

Reardon, E., Nicosia, N., & Moore, N. Y. (2007). The utilization of women-owned small businesses in federal contracting. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Institute.

Richter, J. (2004). Public-private partnerships for health: A trend with no alternatives. Development, 47, 43-48.

Robb, A. M. (2002). Entrepreneurial performance by women and minorities: The case of new firms. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(4), 383.

Robinson, S. (2007). Business failure rates: A look at sex and location. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 13(1), 45.

Sawhney, M., & Zabin, J. (2002). Managing and measuring relational equity in the network economy. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4), 313-332.

Seong, S., Horn, K., & Held, B. (2008). Estimating the cost of administering the Department of Defense Small Busienss Innovation Research (SBIR) program. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Institute.

Shaw, E., Carter, S., & Brierton, J. (2001). Unequal entrepreneurs: Why female enterprise is an uphill business. London: The Industrial Society.

Treichel, M., & Scott, J. A. (2006). Women-owned businesses and access to bank credit: Evidence from three surveys since 1987. Venture Capital, 8(1), 51.

Verheul, I., Risseeuw, P., & Bartelse, G. (2002). Gender differences in strategy and human resource management. International Small Business Journal, 20(4), 443.

Wallsten, S. J. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the Small Business Innovation Research program. RAND Journal of Economics (RAND Journal of Economics), 31(1), 82.

Downloads

Published

2010-01-21

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1 (2010)

Section

Articles

License

The Journal of Small Business Strategy (the “Publisher”) and the Author(s) agree as follows:
 
1.Author(s) hereby grant to Publisher all right, title, and interest in and to the Work, including copyright to all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. If Publisher does not publish the Work within two (2) years of the Effective Date, copyright shall revert back to the Author. Publisher agrees to always credit Author(s) as the author(s) of the Work.
 
2.Publisher hereby grants Author a royalty-free, limited license for the following purposes, provided the Work is always identified as having first been published by Publisher.
    •The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of the Work for use in teaching;
    •The right to use all or part of the material contained in the Work in a book by the Author(s), or in a collection of the Author(s)’s work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author(s)’s place of employment, and for promotion and any other non-commercial purposes;
    •The right to use figures and tables from the Work for any purpose;
    •The right to make presentations of material from the Work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author(s)’s Web site and on the Author(s)’s university’s institute repository;
Such license shall be effective when the Work is first published in the Journal of Small Business Strategy.
 
3.The Author(s) represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author(s)’s original work and that Author(s) has full power to enter into this agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property right of another; (c) contains no materials which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or violates another’s civil right, right of privacy, or is otherwise unlawful; and (d) has not been previously published, in whole or in part. Author(s) shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss or expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.

How to Cite

Performance of Historically Underrepresented Firms in the Public-Private Sector. (2010). Journal of Small Business Strategy (archive Only), 21(1), 18-38. https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/136