Leadership and Governance Decisions in Family Business Performance: An Application of Fuzzy Sets Logic
Leadership, governance and performance in family businesses are broadly studied, but results are contradictory. There is a need for deeper understanding of these relationships since emotional and behavioral aspects are complex in these types businesses. Questions on the how and the why of board functioning and ownership, and their influences on performance are scarce, given lack of data or a focus on quantitative data. To find a balance between qualitative and quantitative methods, we explore fuzzy sets logic as a methodology to expand knowledge in family businesses and present an application to build a representation of entrepreneurial performance results based on board of directors’ composition and CEO’s ownership, using case studies. Results indicate that the methodology offers alternative explanations to governance, leadership and performance dimensions in these businesses. Using fuzzy sets logic, we find that entrepreneurial performance is higher when outsiders’ membership in boards of directors and CEO ownership are both high as well.
Anderson, R., & Reeb, D. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328. doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00567
Bojadziev, G. & Bojadziev, M. (1995). Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, Applications, Singapore, World Scientific.
Blumentritt, T. (2006). The relationship between boards and planning in family businesses. Family Business Review, 19(1), 65-72.
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2003). Corporate governance: Decade of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371-382.
Eng, S. and Woodside, A. (2012). Configural analysis of the drinking man: Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysiss, Addictive Behaviors, 37(4), 541–543.
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2009). Strategic leadership: theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gersick, K. E. & Feliu, N. (2014). Governing the family enterprise. In Melin, L., Nordqvist, M. & Sharma, P. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Family Business (196-225). London: Sage Publications LTD.
Goel, S., Jussila, L., & Ikäheimonen, T. (2014). Governance in family firms, In Melin, L., Nordqvist, M. & Sharma, P. (Eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Family Business. London: Sage Publications LTD.
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137.
Grint, K. (1997). Fuzzy Management: Contemporary ideas and practices at work. New York: Oxford.
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396.
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235-255.
Jackson, G. (2005). Employee Representation in the board compared: A fuzzy sets analysis of corporate governance, unionism, and political institutions. Industrielle Beziehungen, 12(3), 1-28.
Kosko, B. (1993). Fuzzy thinking. New York: Hyperion.
Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2009). Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: A social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 33(6), 1169-1191. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00339.
Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2006). Interorganizational familiness: How family firms use interlocking directorates to build community-level social capital. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30(6), 755-775. McDonald, M. L., & Westphal, J. D. (2003). Getting by with the advice of their friends: CEOs' advice networks and firms' strategic responses to poor performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 1-32.
Mill, J.S.  (1967). A system of logic: Ratiocinative and inductive. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19(1), 73-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2006.00063.x
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.03.004.
Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 27(4), 367-382. doi: 10.1111/1540-8520.t01-1-00015
Nordqvist, M, Marzano, G., Brenes, E., Jimenez, G., & Fonseca, M. (2011). Understanding entrepreneurial family businesses in uncertain environments: opportunities and resources in Latin America. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence structure. New York: Harper & Row. Publications LTD.
Ragin, C.C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, USA: The University of Chicago Press.
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
STEP Project. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.babson.edu/Academics/centers/blank-center/global-research/step/pages/home.aspx
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385-417.
Westphal, J. D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 7-24.
Woodside, A. G. (2011). Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis in industrial buying-marketing negotiations over share of business. Society for Marketing Advances Proceedings, 25(1), 161-162.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
Zahra, S.A. (1995). Corporate entrepreneur-ship and financial performance: The case of management leveraged buyouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(3), 225–247.