Connectivity & Communication: A Study of How Small Wine Businesses Use the Internet

Authors

  • Armand Gilinsky, Jr. Sonoma State University
  • Elizabeth C. Thach Sonoma State University
  • Karen J. Thompson Sonoma State University

Abstract

This paper addresses the development and effects of Internet use by small wine businesses.   It includes useful insights that can be applied to other small businesses, and also provides helpful information for consultants and entrepreneurship educators. An exploratory framework is presented that includes a four-stage sequence through which small businesses typically progress in relation to the use of Internet-related tools. The stages include awareness, design, implementation, and practice. Propositions are also developed to guide analysis of the framework, and an  empirical test of various parts of the framework is performed using a sample of 382 wineries. Results showed that, beyond the use of e-mail for communication and connectivity, awareness of the Internet's uses is moderate, while implementation is moderate to low. Thirty-nine percent of the respondents believe the Internet will make a strong contribution to sales and profitability in the future, though only 9% report they are currently achieving this with Internet utilization.

References

Afuah, A., & Tucci, C.L. (2001). Internet business models and strategies. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszerski, C., Lutz. R., Sawyer, A., & Wood, S. (1997). Interactive home shopping: Consumer, retailer, and manufacturer incentives to participate in electronic marketplaces. Journal of Marketing, 61( 3), 38-53.

Aldrich, H., & Fiol, C. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19( 4), 645-670.

Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in E-Business. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493-520.

AVA (2002). American Vintner's Association Website. Available at www.ava.org.

Brown, B., & Butler, J. (1995). Competitors as allies: A study of entrepreneurial networks in the U.S. wine industry. Journal of Small Business Management, 33( 3), 57-67.

Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.

Delacroix, J., & Swaminathan, A. (1991). Cosmetic, speculative, and adaptive organizational change in the wine industry: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 631-662.

DiBernardo, N. (2000). D&B study shows seven out of ten U.S. small businesses now have Internet access. Dun & Bradstreet News and Events. Available at http://www.dnb.com/newsview/0500/news8.htn1 .

Dutta, S., & Segev, A. (1999). Business transformation on the Internet. European Management Journal. 17, 466-476.

Evans, P.B., & Wurster, T.S. (1999). Blown to bits: How the new economics of information tran>forms strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Garciano, L., & Kaplan, S.N. (2000). The effects of business-to-business e-commerce on transaction costs. Working paper, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago. Gaskill, L.R., Van Auken, H.E., & Manning, R.A. (1993). A factor analytic study of the perceived causes of small business failure. Journal of Small Business Management, 31( 4), 18.

Gilinsky, A., Stanny, E., McCline, R.L., & Eyler, E. (2001). Does size matter? An empirical investigation into the competitive strategies of the small firm. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 12( 2), 1-13.

Griffith, D., & Krampf, R. (1998). An examination of the Web-based strategies of the top 100 U.S. retailers. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(3), 12-23.

Hartman, A., Sifonis, J., & Kadar, J. (2000). Net Ready: Strategies for success in the economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Henderson, R. (1993). Underinvestment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: Evidence from the photolithographic alignment industry. Rand Journal of Economics, 24(1), 248-69.

Kalakota, R., & Whinston, A. (!996). Frontiers of electronic commerce. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

Kickul, J., Sandercock, P., Fink!, J., & Selden, J. (2002). When push comes to shove: The role of business criticality and innovation on e-commerce strategic orientation and initiatives. Proceedings of 11' Annual Conference of the U.S. Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Reno, NV, 1-20, http://www.usasbe.org!knowledge/proceedings/2002/index.asp

Levenburg, N., Schwarz, T., & Dandridge, T. (2002). Understanding adoption of Internet technologies. Proceedings of I 1' Annual Conference of the U.S. Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Reno, NV, 1-6, http://www.usasbe.org/knowledge/proceedings/2002/index.asp

Lohrke, F., & Franklin, G. (2002). The Internet as information conduit: A transaction cost analysis model of small business Internet use. Proceedings of I 1' Annual Conference of the U.S. Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Reno, NV, 1-14, http://www.usasbe.org/knowledge/proceedings/2002/index.asp

Miesenbock, K-J. (1988). Small business and exporting: a literature review. International Small Business Journal, 6(2), 42-61.

Perdue, L. (1999). The wrath of grapes: The coming wine industry shakeout and how lo take advantage of it. New York, NY: Avon Books, Inc.

Poon, S., & Swatman, P. ( 1999). An exploratory study of small business Internet commerce issues. Information & Management, 35, 9-18.

Premkumar, G., & Ramamurthy, K. (1995). The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences, 26, 303-336.

Ruth, J-P.S. (2000). So far, small biz is only dabbling in E-Commerce. Business News New Jersey, I 3(23), 24.

Saunders, C., & Clark, S. (1992). EDI adoption and implementation: A focus on interorganizational linkages. Information Resources Management Journal, 5( 1), 9-19.

Shaw, M., Gardner, D., & Thomas, H. (1997). Research opportunities in electronic commerce. Decision Support Systems, 2I , 149-156.

Smith, M.D., Bailey, J., & Bymjofsson, E. (1999). Understanding digital markets: Review and assessment. In E. Brynjofsson & B. Kahin (Eds.), Understanding the Digital Economy, (pp. 99-1 36). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Stoeberl, P. A., Parker, G. E., & Joo, S. J. (1998). Relationship between organizational change and failure in the wine industry: An event history analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 35( 4}, 537-56.

Strauss, J., & Hill, D. (2001). Consumer complaints by e-mail: An exploratory investigation of corporate responses and consumer reactions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, I 5, 63-73.

Swaminathan, A. ( 1995). The proliferation of specialist organizations in the American wine industry, 1941-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4}, 653-81.

Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, Jl., 3-8.

Van Beveren, J., & Thomson, H. (2002). The use of electronic commerce by SMEs in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(3), 250-253.

Vassos, T. ( 1996). Strategic Internet Marketing. Indianapolis, IN: Que Corporation. Venkatraman, N. (2000). Five steps to a dot.com strategy: How to find your footing on the Web. Sloan Management Review, 41(3), 15-28.

Weiss, M. (2000). Manufacturers not making full use of tech. Atlanta Business Chronicle, 11( 54), 20.

Wine Business Monthly, Wine industry directory and almanac-2001. Sonoma, CA: Wine Business Publications.

Downloads

Published

2003-06-24

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2003)

Section

Articles

License

The Journal of Small Business Strategy (the “Publisher”) and the Author(s) agree as follows:
 
1.Author(s) hereby grant to Publisher all right, title, and interest in and to the Work, including copyright to all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. If Publisher does not publish the Work within two (2) years of the Effective Date, copyright shall revert back to the Author. Publisher agrees to always credit Author(s) as the author(s) of the Work.
 
2.Publisher hereby grants Author a royalty-free, limited license for the following purposes, provided the Work is always identified as having first been published by Publisher.
    •The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of the Work for use in teaching;
    •The right to use all or part of the material contained in the Work in a book by the Author(s), or in a collection of the Author(s)’s work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author(s)’s place of employment, and for promotion and any other non-commercial purposes;
    •The right to use figures and tables from the Work for any purpose;
    •The right to make presentations of material from the Work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author(s)’s Web site and on the Author(s)’s university’s institute repository;
Such license shall be effective when the Work is first published in the Journal of Small Business Strategy.
 
3.The Author(s) represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author(s)’s original work and that Author(s) has full power to enter into this agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property right of another; (c) contains no materials which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or violates another’s civil right, right of privacy, or is otherwise unlawful; and (d) has not been previously published, in whole or in part. Author(s) shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss or expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.

How to Cite

Connectivity & Communication: A Study of How Small Wine Businesses Use the Internet. (2003). Journal of Small Business Strategy (archive Only), 14(2), 37-57. https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/530

Most read articles by the same author(s)