David Versus Goliath: Strategic Behavior of Small Firms In Consolidated Industries

  • Monica Zimmerman Temple University
  • Denise Dunlap Temple University
  • Robert D. Hamilton, III Temple University
  • T. L. Hill Temple University
  • Elisabeth A. Chapman Temple University

Abstract

This study assesses the effect of strategy selection and firm adaptability on small firm performance,  using firm  tenure  as a moderator  variable.  The study  is based  upon interviews with sixteen small firms operating in rapidly changing and consolidating industries. All of the firms in the study pursued a differentiation strategy. Half of the firms  pursued  a  broad product strategy and more than three-quarters pursued a broad service strategy. The study found that small firms adapt by addressing community needs and forming cooperative agreements with other small firms but not larger firms. Variation among the industries studied suggests that the intensity of industry concentration affects firm adaptation decisions. For instance, while the heavily concentrated hardware anti drugstore industries  showed limited adaptation, the unconsolidated bookstore industry showed greater commitment to adaptive strategies. In addition, firm tenure was found to affect the adaptation of the small firms  studied.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chaganti, R., Chaganti, R., & Mahajan, V. (1989). Profitable small business strategies under different types of competition. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13( 3), 21-35.
Chell, E., & Haworth, J. ( 1992). The competitive performance of SMEs in the UK clothing industry. International Small Business Journal, 10( 3), I 1- 24.
Daft, R. L. (2000). Management. (5th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press.
Davis, G., & Thompson, T. (1994). A social movement perspective on corporate control. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39( I ), 141-173.
Dess, G.G., & Robinson, R.M. (1984). Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5(3), 265-274.
Ehrenfeld, T. ( 1995). The demise of Mom and Pop?. Inc., 17(1), 46-48.
Federal Register. (2000, May 15). Small Business Size Regulations; Size Standards and The North American Industry Classification System. 65(94), 30836-39863.
Fenn, D. (1997). Sleeping with the enemy. Inc.. 19(16 ), 78-88.
Granovetter, M. ( 1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of 'embeddness.' American Journal of Sociology, 91( 3), 481-510.
Halverson, R. 1996. O'Reilly's family strategy counters auto megachains. Discount Store News, 35(21), 23-24.
Hirschman, A.O. (1958). The strategy of economic developmelll. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hodgetts, R., & Kuratko, D. (1995). Effective small business management. Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press.
Kean, R., Gaskill, L., Leistritz, L., & Jasperet, C. ( 1998). Effects of community characteristics, business environment, and competitive strategies on rural retail business performance. Journal a/ Small Business Management, 36(2), 45-57.
Kean, R., Niemeyer, S., & Miller, M. (1996). Competitive strategies in the craft product retailing industry. Journal a/ Small Business Manageme111, 34( 1 ), 13-23.
Kleindl, B. (2000). Competitive dynamics and new business models for SMEs in the virtual marketplace. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 5( I), 73-85.
Kuratko, D., & Hodgetts, R. (1998). Entrepreneurship: A contemporary approach. (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: The Dryden Press.
Lieber, R., (1997, March 31). Beating the odds. Fortune, 135(6), 82-90.
Litz. R. A., (2000). Where Everybody Knows Your Name: Extraorganizational Clan­ Bu ilding as Sma ll Firm Strategy for Home-Field Advantage. Journal of Small Business Strategy, //(I), l -13.
Litz, R. A .. & Stewart, A. C. (2000). The Late Show: The Effects of After-Hours Accessibility on the Performance of Small Retailers. Journal of Small Business Management, 38( 1 ), 1-26.
Longenecker, J., & Moore. C. ( 1987). Small-Business management. (7th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing Co.
Lowes Companies, Inc. (2000). lolve 's Reports 5 / % Increase in Fourth Quarter Net Earnings, 2000. Retrieved August 8, 2000, from http://www.shareholder.com/lowes/ News/20000218-1 4228. htm
Macht, J., ( 1 999). Competing Interests. I nc., 21 (6), 73-75.McCune, J., ·(1994). In the shadow of Wa l-Mart. Management Review, 83( 12), I0-1 7.
Maggina, A., ( 1992). SM Es in Greece: Toward 1992 and beyond. Journal of Small Business Management. 30( 3), 87-90.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B., (1995). Designing quality research. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Maurer, R., ( I 998). David vs. Goliath. Folio. 27(9), 1 16.
Milliot, J., ( 1999, January 4). Indies file more lawsuits against chains. Publishers Weekly. 246 (1), 1 8.
Milliot, J., (2002). Industry Sales Flat in 2001 at $25.4 Billion. Retrieved March 4, 2002 and on August 22, 2002, from http://publishersweekly.reviewsnews.com/index.asp?layout=articleArchive&articleid= CA!99355&display=searchResults&stt=OO I
Porter, M., (!980a). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M., (1980b). Generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Academy of Management Journal. 27(3), 467-488.
Porter, M., ( 1985). Cotnpetirive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior perfornzance. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M., (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.
Small Business Administration (2002, May 29). SBA Office of Advocacy Small Business Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved August I 7, 2002, from http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/sbfaq.html#q2.
StockSelector.com (2000). Home Depot. Retrieved August 8, 2000, from http://www.stockselector.com/industrycomp.asp.
United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2001). 10-K, Amazon Com Inc. Retrieved March I 8, 2002, from http://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/I 018724/ 000 I 03221001500087/000 I 0322 I 0-01-500087.txt
United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (200 I ). I 0-K, Barnes and Noble Inc. Retrieved August 8, 2000, from http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/890491/ 0000950 I 2301501 788/00009501 23-01-501788.txt
United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (200 I ). I 0-K. Book A Million Inc. Retrieved March 18, 2002, from http://www.sec.gov/ Archives/edgar/data/891919/ 0000950144-00-005642-index.htrnl.
United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2001). 10-K. Borders Group Inc.
Retrieved March 18, 2002, from http://www.sec.gov/ A rchives/edgar/data/9405 IO/ 0000950124-00-002431-index.htrnl.
Walgreen's. (2000). Walgreen 's Rankings and Ratings. Retrieved August 8, 2000, from http://www. wa !greens.com/.
Welsh, J.A., & White, J. E. (1981 ). A small business is not a little big business. Harvard Business Review, 59(4), 18-32.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Published
2002-06-23
How to Cite
ZIMMERMAN, Monica et al. David Versus Goliath: Strategic Behavior of Small Firms In Consolidated Industries. Journal of Small Business Strategy, [S.l.], v. 13, n. 2, p. 56-74, june 2002. ISSN 2380-1751. Available at: <https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/507>. Date accessed: 18 apr. 2019.
Section
Articles