New Technology-Based Firms' Persuit of SBIR Funds


  • Howard E. Van Auken Iowa State University
  • Marcene S. Sonneborn


This paper presents the results of a study that investigated the relationship between characteristics of firms and their experience with applying for Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) funding.  The basic issues investigated are (1) the relationship between firm characteristics and the decision to apply for SBIR funding, and (2) the relationship between firm characteristics and whether the SBIR application was successful. The results of the study demonstrate that local efforts to promote the SBJR program  by encouraging firms to apply and by increasing the visibility of workshops can lead to a greater number of firms to apply for SBIR funding. Efforts directed at firms in small communities may be even more effective than efforts directed towards firms in large communities. The results also suggest that organizations that provide SBIR assistance may consider screening potential clients according to the business goals of firm’s owners. Owners of "life-style" firms may need extra encouragement and, perhaps, assistance to apply for SBJR funding. Finally, the results also imply that firms that are smaller (as compared to larger firms), have more limited experience raising capital, and serve a smaller market may need greater assistance in pursuing SBIR funding.


Ang, J.S. (1991). Small business uniqueness and the theory of financial management. The Journal of Small Business Finance, I (1), l -13.

Ang, J.S. ( 1992). On the theory of finance for privately held firms. Journal of Small Business Finance, I (3), 185-203.

Changanti, R., DeCarlos, D., & Deeds, D. (l995). Predictors of capital structure in small ventures. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 20 (Winter), 7-18.

Chrisman, J. (1999). The influence of outsider-generated knowledge resources on venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 37 (October), 42-58.

Irwin, D., & Kienow, P. (1996). High-tech R&D subsidies: Estimating the effects of Sematech. Journal of International Econom ics, 40, 323-344.

Lang, J ., Calantone, R., &. Gudmundson, D. (l997). Small firm information seeking as a response to environmental threats and opportunities. Journal of Small Business Management, 35 (January), l l -23.

McMahon, R., & Stanger, A. (l995). Understanding the small enterprise financial objective function. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 19 (Summer), 21-39.

Petty, J., & Bygrave, W. (1993). What does finance have to say to the entrepreneur? The Journal of Small Business Finance, 2 (2), 125-137.

Small Business Administration,, (2000).

Sohl, J. (1999). The early-stage equity market in the USA. Venture Capital: An International Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance, I (2) I 0 l -120.

Timmons, J. (1999). New venture creation, (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: Irwin Pub.

Van Auken, H. (2000, February). The famil iarity of small technology-based business owners with sources of financing: impact of location and capitalization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Orlando, FA.

Wallsten, S. (2000). The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: The case of the small business innovation research program, Rand Journal of Economics, 11(Spring), 82-10 I.







How to Cite

New Technology-Based Firms’ Persuit of SBIR Funds. (2001). Journal of Small Business Strategy (archive Only), 12(2), 14-25.