Sexual Harassment of Females by Males in the Workplace: Small Business Contrasted with Large Businesses
Abstract
Sexual harassment continues to be an important topic, receiving the attention of small and large businesses. Formal claims regarding unlawful, social-sexual behavior in the workplace doubled during the J 990's. Some small business owners believe that sexual harassment is not a crucial concern, compared with their counterparts in large businesses. Some small business owners possess the misconception that sexual harassment, regarding federal and state law, apply primarily to large businesses. Sexualization in the workplace occurs when sexual jokes, comments, innuendos, and sexual or seductive dress are tolerated, or encouraged, as well as the more blatant offense of improperly touching another employee. The membership of the Society for Human Resource Management was the database for this study. A random sample from small businesses of fewer than 500 employees and large businesses with more than 500 employees was selected Important findings indicate that sexual harassment was more of a problem for large firms as there is more male-female interaction and social pressure. This is true even though more training takes place in larger, rather than smaller, businesses. The findings may also indicate more of a reluctance by females in smaller firms to report such incidences. Respondents believe more formal training, education and behavior modeling, especially in small businesses, are needed to maximize the effectiveness of written policies.
References
Champagne, P. J., & McAfee, R. B. ( 1989). Auditing sexual harassment. Personnel Journal, 74( 10), 137.
Despande. S. P., & Golhar, D. Y. (1994). H RM practices in large and small manufacturing firms: A comparative study. Journal of Small Business Management, 32(2), 49-56.
Estess, A. B. ( 1995). Truth or consequences. Entrepreneurs, 23( 1 1), 82, 84-85.
Gutek, B. A. ( 1 995). How subjective is sexual harassment? An examination of rater effects. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1 7(4), 447-467.
Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A. G., & Conrad, A. M. (1990). Predicting social-sexual behavior at work: A contact hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 560-577.
Hay Group. (1993). Some companies still don't want to know. H R Focus, 70(4), 2.
Kores, A. ( 1 992). The EEOC and sexual harassment. Personal Commun ication. June 29. K ruger, P. (1995). See no evil. Working Woman, 20(6). 32-35, 64, 77.
Lach, D. H., & Gwatney-Gibbs, P. A. (1993). Sociological perspectives on sexual harassment and workplace dispute resolutions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 102-1 15.
Luchs, C. ( 1 997, January). Small companies, large exposures. Best's Review.
Mason-Draffen, C., & Wax, Alan. J. ( 1995, November 24). How she won 'glass' action. Newsday. A06.
Moates, H., & K u londa, D. J. (1990). An examination of differences between supervisors in large and small compan ies. Journal of Small Business Management, 28(3), 27-36.
Moore, H., Gat l in, R., Cangelosi, J., & Am, J. (1997). Effectiveness of current sexual harassment prevention policies and train ing. Central Business Review, 41-45.
McGreery, C. ( 1 997). Lener from the executive editor. Small Business Success, (VIII), 2. Nelton, S. ( 1 995, March). Sexual harassment: Red ucing the risk. Nation's Business, 83(8), 24.
Pryor, J. 13., La Vite, C. B., & Stoller, L. M. (1993). A social-psychological analysis of sexual harassment: The person/situation interaction. Journal of Vocational Education, 42(1), 68-83.
SBA Office of Advocacy Facts About Small Business. (1997). Available: htt p://www.sbaonline.sba.gov/ ADVO/stats/fact I.html date: 12/30/97.
Sandroff, R. (1992, June). Sexual harassment-- The inside story. Working Woman, 1 7(6), 47-51, 78.
Sherman, A. J. (1992). Sexual harassment policies a must. D & B Reports, 40, 45.
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1995). Statist ical Abstract. County Business Patterns. Annual Edit ion.
Webb, S. L. (1992). Deal ing with sex ual harassment. Small Business Report, 1 7(1), 1 1-14.