Does the Size of the Organization Affect Compensation Strategies? An Empirical Analysis

Authors

  • Nancy E. Day University of Missouri - Kansas City

Abstract

Little is known about how compensation strategies in sn1all businesses differ from those in large firms. Based on past research involving organizational characteristics and pay strategies, assumptions were initially made that small firms would exhibit more flexible, egalitarian and non-traditional pay strategies, serving to maximize pay-at-risk  and minimize pay levels to reduce the fixed costs of employment. Consequently, data on compensation policies were analyzed from 148 successful small and large businesses. Contrary to predictions, there were no differences between small and large organizations in pay level, pay structure, emphasis on market competitiveness or emphasis on paying for performance. Implications of these findings are discussed in terms of their relevance to the small business decision maker.

References

Aguinis, H. ( 1 995). Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21. I 141 -1 1 58.

Balkin, D.B., & Gomez-Mejia, L.R. ( 1 984). Determinants of R&D compensation strategies in the high tech industry. Personnel Psychology, 37, 635-650.

Balkin, D.B., & Gomez-Mejia, L.R. (1987). A contingency theory of compensation strategy. Strategic Management Jo11rnal, 8, 1 69-182.

Balkin, D.B., & Gomez-Mejia. L.R. (1990). Matching compensation and organizational strategies. Strategic Management Jo11rnal, 11, 153-169.

Doeringer, P.B., & Piore, M.J. ( 1 971). internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.

Emerson, S. ( 1 991). Job evaluation: A barrier to excel lence? Compensation and Benefits Review, 23, 39-51 .

Gerhart, B.. & Mi l kovich,G.T. ( 1990). Organizational differences in managerial compensatim and fi nancial performance. Academy of Managemel1f Journal, 33, 663-691 .

Gerhart, B., & Mi l kovich,G.T. (1992). Employee compensation. I n M.D. Dun nette and L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of lnd11strial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 481 -569). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Gomez-Mejia, L.R. ( 1992). Structure and process of diversificat ion, compensationstrategy and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 381-397.

Gomez-Mejia, L.R., & Balk in, D.B. ( 1 992). Compensation, organizational strategy and firm performance. Cincinnati: South-Western Publish ing Co.

Lawler, E.E. ( 1 990). Strategic pay: Aligning organizational strategies and pay systems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Lawler, E.E., & Jenki ns, G.D. (1 992). Strategic reward systems. I n M.D. Dunnette & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology( p p. I 009-1 055} Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Miceli, M.P., Jung, I., Near, J.P., & Greenberger, D.B. (1991). Predictors and outcomes of reactions to pay-for-performance plans. Jo11rnal of Applied Psychology, 76, 508-521.

Milkovich, G.T., & Newman, J.M. (1996). Compensation (5'' ed.). Homewood, I L: I rwin. Pedhazur, E.J. ( 1 982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2"' ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W. ( 1 986). Self reports in organ izat ional research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Managemel1f , 12, 531-544.

Rumelt, R.P. (1974). Strategy, str11cture and economic performance. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

Schuster,J.R., & Zingheim, P.K. (1992). The new pay: Linking employee and organizational performance. New Yark: Lexington Books.

Downloads

Published

1997-01-11

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (1997)

Section

Articles

License

The Journal of Small Business Strategy (the “Publisher”) and the Author(s) agree as follows:
 
1.Author(s) hereby grant to Publisher all right, title, and interest in and to the Work, including copyright to all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. If Publisher does not publish the Work within two (2) years of the Effective Date, copyright shall revert back to the Author. Publisher agrees to always credit Author(s) as the author(s) of the Work.
 
2.Publisher hereby grants Author a royalty-free, limited license for the following purposes, provided the Work is always identified as having first been published by Publisher.
    •The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of the Work for use in teaching;
    •The right to use all or part of the material contained in the Work in a book by the Author(s), or in a collection of the Author(s)’s work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author(s)’s place of employment, and for promotion and any other non-commercial purposes;
    •The right to use figures and tables from the Work for any purpose;
    •The right to make presentations of material from the Work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author(s)’s Web site and on the Author(s)’s university’s institute repository;
Such license shall be effective when the Work is first published in the Journal of Small Business Strategy.
 
3.The Author(s) represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author(s)’s original work and that Author(s) has full power to enter into this agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property right of another; (c) contains no materials which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or violates another’s civil right, right of privacy, or is otherwise unlawful; and (d) has not been previously published, in whole or in part. Author(s) shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss or expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.

How to Cite

Does the Size of the Organization Affect Compensation Strategies? An Empirical Analysis. (1997). Journal of Small Business Strategy (archive Only), 8(1), 83-96. https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/360