Addressing the Work-Life Interface: Strategic Implications for Small Business


  • Harriette S. McCaul North Dakota State University
  • Harriette S. McCaul North Dakota State University


Although some research has assessed the involvement of corporate America  in work-life policies and programs, Iii/le is known about the involvement of small businesses in this area. The purpose of this study was lo learn more about how small businesses are responding to work-life issues and to examine the relationship of various organizational characteristics to the implementation  of work-life policies  and programs.    The results indicate that small businesses have responded to work-life issues and concerns in a piecemeal manner and have been relatively non-responsive overall, even though participating  would carry little cost. Traditional economic benefits (e.g., health insurance) were most likely to be offered, even limited care for dependents (e.g., resource and referral services) least likely. Further, fewer than I 0% of the firms have conducted any kind of formal  assessment of work-life needs and issues.   We suggest that a lack of strategic attention by small businesses to the work-life interface is short-sighted in view of quality and productivity issues, changing demographics and the recruitment and retention of well-qualified employees.


Auerbach, J.D. ( 1988). In the business of child care: Employer initiatives and working women. New York: Praeger.

Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (1990). Work and Family Programs: A Growing Benefit for Small Companies, in The BNA Special Report Series on Work and Family. Washington, D.C. (January).

Friedman, D. (1991). Li nki ng Work-Family Issues to the Bottom Li ne, Report Number 962. New York: The Conference Board.

Galinsky , E., Friedman, D., & Hernandez, C. (1991 ). The Corporate Reference Guide.

New York: The Famil ies and Work Institute.

Hofferth, S. L., Bayfield, A., Deich, S., & Holcomb, P. (1991 ). The National Child Care Survey:1990. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.

Grover, S. L. & K. J. Crooker (1995) Who Appreciates Family Responsive Human Resource Policies: The Impact of Fam ily-Friendly Pol icies on the Organizational Attachment of Parents and Non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48( 2), 271 -288.

Katz, M. & C. Piotrkowski ( 1983). Correlates of family role strai n among employed black women. Family Relations, 32, 331-339.

Lambert, S. L. (I990). Processes Linking Work and Family: A Critical Review and Research Agenda. Human Relations, 43, 239-257.

Lobel, S. A. (I991). Allocation oflnvestment in Work and Family Roles: Alternative Theories and Implications for Research. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 507-521.

Morgan, H. & F. Milliken ( 1992). Keys to Action: Understand ing Differences i n Organizations' Responsiveness to Work and Family Issues. Human Resource Management, 31, 227-248.

Morgan, H. & Tucker, K. ( 1 991 ). Companies that care: The most family-friendly companies in America, what they offer and how they got that way. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Society of Human Resource Management. (1992) Work and family survey report. Alexandria, Va.

Spence, J. T., Deaux, K. & Helmreich, R. L. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary society. In Handbook of Social Psychology. eds. G. Lindzey & E. Aronson New York: Random House, 149-178.

U.S. Bureau of the Census (1991). County Business Patterns, annual.

U.S. Department of Commerce( I 993). Statistical Abstract of the United States . Washington, DC: Bureau of Census.

Vanderkolk, B. S. & A. A. Young (1991). The Work and Family Revolution: How Companies Can Keep Employees Happy and Business Profitable. New York: Fact File, Inc.







How to Cite

Addressing the Work-Life Interface: Strategic Implications for Small Business. (1996). Journal of Small Business Strategy (archive Only), 7(2), 29-44.