Addressing the Work-Life Interface: Strategic Implications for Small Business

Authors

  • Harriette S. McCaul North Dakota State University
  • Harriette S. McCaul North Dakota State University

Abstract

Although some research has assessed the involvement of corporate America  in work-life policies and programs, Iii/le is known about the involvement of small businesses in this area. The purpose of this study was lo learn more about how small businesses are responding to work-life issues and to examine the relationship of various organizational characteristics to the implementation  of work-life policies  and programs.    The results indicate that small businesses have responded to work-life issues and concerns in a piecemeal manner and have been relatively non-responsive overall, even though participating  would carry little cost. Traditional economic benefits (e.g., health insurance) were most likely to be offered, even limited care for dependents (e.g., resource and referral services) least likely. Further, fewer than I 0% of the firms have conducted any kind of formal  assessment of work-life needs and issues.   We suggest that a lack of strategic attention by small businesses to the work-life interface is short-sighted in view of quality and productivity issues, changing demographics and the recruitment and retention of well-qualified employees.

References

Auerbach, J.D. ( 1988). In the business of child care: Employer initiatives and working women. New York: Praeger.

Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (1990). Work and Family Programs: A Growing Benefit for Small Companies, in The BNA Special Report Series on Work and Family. Washington, D.C. (January).

Friedman, D. (1991). Li nki ng Work-Family Issues to the Bottom Li ne, Report Number 962. New York: The Conference Board.

Galinsky , E., Friedman, D., & Hernandez, C. (1991 ). The Corporate Reference Guide.

New York: The Famil ies and Work Institute.

Hofferth, S. L., Bayfield, A., Deich, S., & Holcomb, P. (1991 ). The National Child Care Survey:1990. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute Press.

Grover, S. L. & K. J. Crooker (1995) Who Appreciates Family Responsive Human Resource Policies: The Impact of Fam ily-Friendly Pol icies on the Organizational Attachment of Parents and Non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48( 2), 271 -288.

Katz, M. & C. Piotrkowski ( 1983). Correlates of family role strai n among employed black women. Family Relations, 32, 331-339.

Lambert, S. L. (I990). Processes Linking Work and Family: A Critical Review and Research Agenda. Human Relations, 43, 239-257.

Lobel, S. A. (I991). Allocation oflnvestment in Work and Family Roles: Alternative Theories and Implications for Research. Academy of Management Journal, 16, 507-521.

Morgan, H. & F. Milliken ( 1992). Keys to Action: Understand ing Differences i n Organizations' Responsiveness to Work and Family Issues. Human Resource Management, 31, 227-248.

Morgan, H. & Tucker, K. ( 1 991 ). Companies that care: The most family-friendly companies in America, what they offer and how they got that way. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Society of Human Resource Management. (1992) Work and family survey report. Alexandria, Va.

Spence, J. T., Deaux, K. & Helmreich, R. L. (1985). Sex roles in contemporary society. In Handbook of Social Psychology. eds. G. Lindzey & E. Aronson New York: Random House, 149-178.

U.S. Bureau of the Census (1991). County Business Patterns, annual.

U.S. Department of Commerce( I 993). Statistical Abstract of the United States . Washington, DC: Bureau of Census.

Vanderkolk, B. S. & A. A. Young (1991). The Work and Family Revolution: How Companies Can Keep Employees Happy and Business Profitable. New York: Fact File, Inc.

Downloads

Published

1996-06-11

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (1996)

Section

Articles

License

The Journal of Small Business Strategy (the “Publisher”) and the Author(s) agree as follows:
 
1.Author(s) hereby grant to Publisher all right, title, and interest in and to the Work, including copyright to all means of expression by any method now known or hereafter developed, including electronic format. If Publisher does not publish the Work within two (2) years of the Effective Date, copyright shall revert back to the Author. Publisher agrees to always credit Author(s) as the author(s) of the Work.
 
2.Publisher hereby grants Author a royalty-free, limited license for the following purposes, provided the Work is always identified as having first been published by Publisher.
    •The right to make and distribute copies of all or part of the Work for use in teaching;
    •The right to use all or part of the material contained in the Work in a book by the Author(s), or in a collection of the Author(s)’s work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work internally at the Author(s)’s place of employment, and for promotion and any other non-commercial purposes;
    •The right to use figures and tables from the Work for any purpose;
    •The right to make presentations of material from the Work;
    •The right to use and distribute the Work on the Author(s)’s Web site and on the Author(s)’s university’s institute repository;
Such license shall be effective when the Work is first published in the Journal of Small Business Strategy.
 
3.The Author(s) represents and warrants that the Work: (a) is the Author(s)’s original work and that Author(s) has full power to enter into this agreement; (b) does not infringe the copyright or property right of another; (c) contains no materials which is obscene, libelous, defamatory or violates another’s civil right, right of privacy, or is otherwise unlawful; and (d) has not been previously published, in whole or in part. Author(s) shall indemnify and hold Publisher harmless against loss or expenses arising from breach of any such warranties.

How to Cite

Addressing the Work-Life Interface: Strategic Implications for Small Business. (1996). Journal of Small Business Strategy (archive Only), 7(2), 29-44. https://libjournals.mtsu.edu/index.php/jsbs/article/view/340